Markets are closed, but positioning pressure hasn’t disappeared.

It has simply gone quiet.

When the calendar pauses, the noise fades.

There are no earnings calls to parse, no macro releases to reinterpret, no policy headlines competing for attention.

What remains is structure.

And structure is easier to see when activity slows.

That’s why holiday gaps matter.

They strip markets down to intent rather than reaction.

They reveal what investors are carrying forward, what they’re unwilling to unwind, and what assumptions they’re prepared to defend into a new year.

This is the right moment to revisit the January Barometer, not as tradition, not as folklore, but as a recurring behavioral signal.

It shows up every year because markets crave early confirmation.

Direction, reassurance, permission.

But the Barometer isn’t a promise.

It’s a pattern that reflects how capital behaves when narratives reset and optionality is highest.

Understanding that distinction is the difference between superstition and signal.

When billionaires like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates back an emerging technology, it’s worth paying attention. 

That’s exactly what’s happening with a little-known company founded by an ex-Google visionary. Alexander Green calls it “one of the most overlooked opportunities in AI right now” — and he’s even an investor himself. 

He’s now sharing the full story, including why early investors are watching closely and why he believes widespread adoption could be just one announcement away.

Get the full rundown here.

The January Barometer is a simple idea, repeated often enough to feel authoritative: As goes January, so goes the year.

In practice, it refers to the S&P 500’s total return from January 1 through January 31.

A positive January is taken as a sign the year will finish higher.

A negative January is assumed to warn of trouble ahead.

The concept was popularized in the early 1970s by Yale Hirsch and the Stock Trader’s Almanac, and it remains almost entirely U.S.-centric.

It is calendar-bound, index-specific, and widely cited for one reason.

Investors want an early anchor.

January offers the first visible data point after positioning resets, fresh capital enters, and forecasts turn into exposure.

That’s what it claims to offer.

The January Barometer’s reputation benefits from a statistical tailwind that rarely gets acknowledged.

Markets rise in most years.

That matters.

When the base rate is already positive, any indicator biased toward bullish outcomes will appear more “accurate” than it truly is.

A strong January often aligns with a strong year not because January predicts the future, but because upward outcomes dominate market history.

This asymmetry shows up clearly over time.

Positive Januarys tend to be followed by positive full-year returns more often than average.

Negative Januarys, however, fail far more frequently as a warning signal.

Markets recover.

Regimes shift.

Liquidity intervenes.

Correlation is mistaken for causation because the calendar provides a clean narrative hook.

But January does not create the year’s outcome.

It reflects the starting conditions under which that year begins.

That distinction matters.

The Barometer does not forecast direction.

It samples behavior.

Treating it as a predictive tool gives it more credit than it earns.

Treating it as a conditional readout is where it becomes useful.

Forget about AI… 

There's a hot new trend on Wall Street… and it's all thanks to President Trump. 

His administration has begun to fast-track the operations of a handful of companies… Accelerating their potential profits. 

That's why legendary investor Louis Navellier is now recommending these three stocks that are being fast-tracked.

Go here to get the details.

Despite its limits, January is not arbitrary.

It is structurally different from most months on the calendar.

Positioning resets.

Fresh capital enters.

Budgets reopen.

Institutional mandates restart.

Forecasts and policy assumptions stop being theory and start becoming exposure.

January is when conviction moves from commentary into portfolios.

That translation process creates visible patterns in flows, leadership, and breadth that don’t occur with the same intensity later in the year.

This is why January often sets early tone.

Not because it predicts outcomes, but because it concentrates decision-making.

In that sense, January functions less like a crystal ball and more like a pressure test.

It reveals how willing investors are to commit risk when optionality is high and narratives are newly formed.

January is not a prediction month.

It is a translation month.

That is why it deserves attention, and why it must be handled carefully.

Momentum often gets dismissed as market mysticism.

In reality, it is a byproduct of behavior.

When positioning, narratives, and liquidity align early in the year, capital tends to reinforce itself.

Allocations follow performance.

Risk budgets loosen when early decisions feel validated.

That reflexivity can persist longer than fundamentals alone would justify.

January is one of the few periods when this feedback loop can form quickly.

Views are fresh.

Exposure is newly established.

Career risk is low.

That combination makes early trends more likely to be reinforced, not immediately faded.

This is why January’s returns matter less than how those returns are achieved.

Momentum is not magic.

It is confirmation bias expressed through capital.

When leadership broadens and participation expands, momentum becomes durable.

When gains are narrow and mechanically driven, it fades quickly.

Understanding that difference is the entire exercise.

I’ve never been more nervous to hit “send.”

What I’m about to share could destroy my standing in crypto.

Critics will say I’ve lost it. Some colleagues may walk away.

But I don’t care.

I uncovered something so important about the 2025 crypto market that I stopped everything and wrote a book about it — a roadmap to what I believe could be the biggest wealth opportunity of the decade.

The evidence is so strong, I’m giving the entire book away for free.

If I’m right, this will change how you see crypto forever.

Claim your FREE copy before I change my mind.

Popular narratives look for answers. Professional frameworks look for conditions.

Professionals do not use the January Barometer as a timing signal.

They use it as a posture check.

The question is not whether January finished green or red.

The question is what kind of market behavior produced that outcome.

Positive Januarys tend to be informative when they reflect expansion in risk appetite.

Negative Januarys are far less reliable when they occur in isolation.

Used correctly, the Barometer reveals whether flows, liquidity, and psychology are aligned at the start of the year.

It does not tell you where markets are going.

It tells you how they are behaving.

Even a strong January does not lock in the year.

History is clear on that point.

The January Barometer tends to fail not randomly, but during regime transitions, when the forces shaping markets change faster than seasonal patterns can absorb.

Policy shocks are the most common disruptor.

Tariffs, fiscal standoffs, funding stress, and debt-ceiling dynamics can overwhelm early momentum quickly by altering the policy backdrop that January’s positioning was built on.

Rates are another pressure point.

If the bond market reprices the path of inflation or policy credibility, equities tend to follow regardless of how the year began.

January strength is fragile when it depends on stable yields that later prove unstable.

Leadership matters just as much.

When January gains are driven by a narrow cluster of index-heavy names, the signal weakens.

Durable years typically begin with participation broadening beneath the surface, not concentrating at the top.

Liquidity and credit deserve constant attention.

Stress rarely announces itself through headlines.

It shows up first in funding markets, volatility structure, and dispersion.

When those signals deteriorate, seasonality loses relevance.

Exogenous shocks remain the wild card.

Geopolitics, energy disruptions, and sudden global growth scares can reset positioning faster than any calendar pattern can anticipate.

This is the core limitation: The January Barometer describes a tendency, not protection.

One of the biggest potential winners? Mode Mobile.

Mode’s EarnPhone hit 50M+ users even before global satellite coverage. With SpaceX eliminating "dead zones", Mode's earning technology can now reach billions more, putting them a step closer to potential IPO.

Accredited investors get in at $0.50/share - up to 120% bonus

Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur. The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period. The offering is only open to accredited investors.

Christmas offers a pause.

Markets rarely do.

As the calendar turns, the real question becomes less about what investors hope for and more about what they are willing to hold when narratives meet reality.

January is where that alignment is tested.

So we will watch it the right way, not as a prophecy, but as a readout of risk appetite, participation, and leadership at the moment the year’s narrative begins to form.

Happy Holidays from all of us, and thank you for being here with us each day.